|
|
The
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filled the trough on Monday for
the greedy record executives to get their snouts wet. By ruling
that Napster can no longer trade copyrighted material, the law
has taken the first steps from the court/boardroom into your hard
drive to dictate what you can and can't hear.
Now
that the corporations are involved it appears that Napster will
become a subscription-based service. If this is the case, then
the powers that be, like the media conglomerate Bertelsmann who
bought a large piece of Napster, should be pushed to institute
an Independent Organization to collect royalties so it doesn't
end up like a Top 20 countdown.
Elitist
associations like ASCAP and BMI are, without a doubt, unqualified
to handle this job. Instead Napster should look to groups such
as the American Film Marketing Association (AFMA), a trade organization
for independent film companies, of which I am vice-president,
to serve as a model for equitable distribution. Otherwise, Napster
is certain to go the way of every other (now commercialized) medium;
it will be a clarion for industry fluff like the Backstreet Boys
and Aerosmith.
For
a year and a half, Napster has been a shining path for independent
artists to find their public. It has also offered the fans a chance
to explore outside of the Geffen produced, MTV-packaged and Mega-Store
marketed shite!
|